While technology advancements generally create efficiencies in traditional business structures and processes, the digital media revolution will challenge traditional content creation, marketing and distribution in new ways. The impact in the short term however will be more subtle.
The flight of advertising dollars from traditional media channels (TV, print, radio) to digital platforms has been clearly established. But it won't be a dollar for dollar shift during the short term because new digital business models have not fully evolved and user behaviors are still changing. The long-run story is expected to be very different, when digital may not only become a significant portion of the total advertising market, but may also encourage increase in the total advertising pie itself.
During this ongoing transition period, digital revenue at most media firms, while growing impressively, will not fully compensate for the loss in their traditional media revenue. We've noticed that several big advertisers today have reduced their total media spend, while shifting a greater portion of that smaller budget to more accountable digital channels that can be effectively tracked and provide a better ROI. Changing/emerging user behaviors can be blamed for declining TV watching amongst younger demos; stagnating Hollywood box office revenue and DVD sales; extremely high engagement but limited realized monetization of social media, among other similar unfavorable trends contributing to shrinkage in the the total pie as the industry transitions.
This decline in revenue is already putting severe pressure on media firms' traditional cost structure as they struggle to maintain margins. This is a good thing. Transformation in an industry provides it an opportunity to re-evaluate its cost structure, among other things. Media industry today is at that juncture. Most people, for example, agree that Hollywood's bloated cost structure provides plenty of room for efficiencies. The folding of New Line Cinema (The Lord of the Rings fame) into Warner Bros is a sign of things to come. Other areas of savings for Hollywood include digital distribution, digital marketing thru blogs, social networks and other bottoms-up digital channels (marketing, at ~25% of a typical film's total cost, is one of its single biggest cost items), etc. Recent writer's strike forced television studios to take a fresh look at how they've done business for a long time. Some innovative cost cutting measures have already been announced by the television networks. Newspaper industry is also implementing new methods - The Capital Times recently announced its decision to stop printing newspapers after a run of over 90 years and move to an online-only edition.
An exciting, but still under-utilized area in my opinion is the leverage of digital platforms for original content/IP creation at a fraction of the current cost, and exploitation of that IP across the entire value chain (television, films, video games, merchandise). Examples: creation of new characters thru online virtual worlds and digital episodic comics; immersive story-telling with episodic video series within social networks where communities contribute to unfolding of the stories as much as the actual characters do; "open source" approach to content creation with reward incentives, etc. In addition to being highly cost-efficient, incubating content through digital platforms can be more effective than traditional approaches. Virgin Comics is trying to prove that storyboarding through comics (both print and digital) with pictures and graphics could do a far better job than a text script in creating characters and plots, communicating the story to the production crew, and facilitating story-telling in the final product (TV show/movie/game).
My views on the key trends, products and firms driving the convergence of entertainment, media and technology.
April 23, 2008
April 14, 2008
Primetime bonanza for the Indian television market
The Indian Premier League (IPL), the world's richest domestic cricket tournament, begins this Friday in India. Launched along the lines of soccer leagues in Europe and professional sports leagues in the U.S. (NFL, NBA, MLB), IPL is a franchise model wherein corporates and sponsors are allowed to buy and run teams. Players are bought through an open auction. This is a first for cricket - the sport has never before been played in this franchise format anywhere in the world. For the inaugural tournament starting on Friday, eight franchises in India were sold off by the governing body for Indian cricket, the Board 0f Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).
IPL is expected to change the face of the global cricket. "Seismic," is how Telegraph UK characterized the effect of IPL on cricket in England, the game's birth place. The sheer size of money involved is completely unprecedented. Before even a ball has been bowled, IPL has already raised more than $1.8bn for its first 10 years through TV rights ($1,026M), franchise auction ($724M) and sponsorship ($108M). This amount is more than what the International Cricket Council (ICC), the official global governing body of cricket, will generate from all of its tournaments over the same period. Pundits are still in a state of shock.
Franchise owners include Mukesh Ambani, head of Reliance Industries and India's richest man, who paid $112MM for the Mumbai franchise. 78 of the world’s leading players were sold in February to the highest IPL bidders for ~$42 million. Earning up to $1.5MM for a three-year contract, many players are making significantly more than what they will ever make playing for their respective countries.
There are obvious concerns for the wider game of cricket - IPL's astronomical salaries and scheduling demands in a busy international cricket calendar (managed by ICC) threaten the fragile balance of international cricket, and ultimately the autonomy of the ICC. BCCI has often been blamed for arm-twisting ICC, given that India's one billion plus cricket-crazy fans drive over two-third of the global cricket revenue. Then, there are fears of players abandoning playing for their country (currently a matter of deep pride & prestige), or retiring early from international cricket in order to play in the IPL.
The U.K. newspaper Guardian quotes Andrew Wildblood, a senior vice-president at the leading sports agency IMG who has been involved in establishing the IPL: "There has never been anything like this in the history of sports. No competition has come from a standing start to where we are today in such a short space of time, or with more financial success."
What's driving this phenomenon? Several factors are contributing to this perfect storm in India.
While ticket sales will contribute to the revenue, the single biggest factor determining IPL's success will be television. India, one of the fastest growing economies in the world, has a huge untapped domestic market for new products & services. Its advertising market therefore is exploding. Indian TV advertising grew by over 20% per year on average for the 10-year period 1995 to 2005. Double-digit growths are forecasted for years going forward. Compare that to flat to declining television advertising in the mature U.S. and western European markets. The New York Times covered India's television potential in its aptly titled piece, In India, the Golden Age of Television is Now.
Cricket, a religion for Indians across its diverse national fabric, aggregates audiences like no other TV programming in the country. Cricket therefore provides the best platform for advertisers to get their message across all demographics. A nationwide, prime-time, cricket bonanza on the Indian TV every evening is a feast for hungry advertisers that will go on for over six weeks. This is bad news for the Indian media companies, who'll find it very hard to compete with cricket for TV ratings.
"India is a rapidly growing economy with an emerging middle class, but if you want to go out here you go to a movie and that's about it. There's a huge demand for entertainment, and we are providing the perfect product model," says IMG's Wildblood.
The IPL tournament is structured in the new Tewnty20 format, the shortest version of cricket that lasts for only three hours compared to One-Day Internationals (8 hrs) and Test matches (five days). Twenty20 is designed to attract the widest section of cricket fans - people can go to the game on weekday evenings after work; women with family responsibilities can easily take a three-hour break. In India, the Twenty20 format has proved successful in drawing in the young, socially mobile demographic that is fueling the country's economic growth. On top of that, India's win in the inaugural Twenty20 World Cup last Fall (organized by ICC) has driven the version's popularity and public expectation sky-high. BCCI wants to cash on it as best and as fast as it can.
Let the show begin!
IPL is expected to change the face of the global cricket. "Seismic," is how Telegraph UK characterized the effect of IPL on cricket in England, the game's birth place. The sheer size of money involved is completely unprecedented. Before even a ball has been bowled, IPL has already raised more than $1.8bn for its first 10 years through TV rights ($1,026M), franchise auction ($724M) and sponsorship ($108M). This amount is more than what the International Cricket Council (ICC), the official global governing body of cricket, will generate from all of its tournaments over the same period. Pundits are still in a state of shock.
Franchise owners include Mukesh Ambani, head of Reliance Industries and India's richest man, who paid $112MM for the Mumbai franchise. 78 of the world’s leading players were sold in February to the highest IPL bidders for ~$42 million. Earning up to $1.5MM for a three-year contract, many players are making significantly more than what they will ever make playing for their respective countries.
There are obvious concerns for the wider game of cricket - IPL's astronomical salaries and scheduling demands in a busy international cricket calendar (managed by ICC) threaten the fragile balance of international cricket, and ultimately the autonomy of the ICC. BCCI has often been blamed for arm-twisting ICC, given that India's one billion plus cricket-crazy fans drive over two-third of the global cricket revenue. Then, there are fears of players abandoning playing for their country (currently a matter of deep pride & prestige), or retiring early from international cricket in order to play in the IPL.
The U.K. newspaper Guardian quotes Andrew Wildblood, a senior vice-president at the leading sports agency IMG who has been involved in establishing the IPL: "There has never been anything like this in the history of sports. No competition has come from a standing start to where we are today in such a short space of time, or with more financial success."
What's driving this phenomenon? Several factors are contributing to this perfect storm in India.
While ticket sales will contribute to the revenue, the single biggest factor determining IPL's success will be television. India, one of the fastest growing economies in the world, has a huge untapped domestic market for new products & services. Its advertising market therefore is exploding. Indian TV advertising grew by over 20% per year on average for the 10-year period 1995 to 2005. Double-digit growths are forecasted for years going forward. Compare that to flat to declining television advertising in the mature U.S. and western European markets. The New York Times covered India's television potential in its aptly titled piece, In India, the Golden Age of Television is Now.
Cricket, a religion for Indians across its diverse national fabric, aggregates audiences like no other TV programming in the country. Cricket therefore provides the best platform for advertisers to get their message across all demographics. A nationwide, prime-time, cricket bonanza on the Indian TV every evening is a feast for hungry advertisers that will go on for over six weeks. This is bad news for the Indian media companies, who'll find it very hard to compete with cricket for TV ratings.
"India is a rapidly growing economy with an emerging middle class, but if you want to go out here you go to a movie and that's about it. There's a huge demand for entertainment, and we are providing the perfect product model," says IMG's Wildblood.
The IPL tournament is structured in the new Tewnty20 format, the shortest version of cricket that lasts for only three hours compared to One-Day Internationals (8 hrs) and Test matches (five days). Twenty20 is designed to attract the widest section of cricket fans - people can go to the game on weekday evenings after work; women with family responsibilities can easily take a three-hour break. In India, the Twenty20 format has proved successful in drawing in the young, socially mobile demographic that is fueling the country's economic growth. On top of that, India's win in the inaugural Twenty20 World Cup last Fall (organized by ICC) has driven the version's popularity and public expectation sky-high. BCCI wants to cash on it as best and as fast as it can.
Let the show begin!
Labels:
BCCI,
ICC,
IMG,
Indian Premier League,
IPL,
Mukesh Ambani
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)